Библиография

1. 1. Sharma S. S. A., Bashir S., Kasi R., Subramaniam R. T. The significance of graphene based composite hydrogels as smart materials: A review on the fabrication, properties, and its applications // FlatChem. 2022. V. 33. ID 100352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flatc.2022.100352
2. 2. Croitoru A.-M., Ficai D., Ficai A. Novel photothermal graphene-based hydrogels in biomedical applications // Polymers. 2024. V. 16. N 8. ID 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16081098
3. 3. Zhang S., Zhao B., Zhang D., Yang M., Huang X., Han L., Chen K., Li X., Pang R., Shang Y., Cao A. Conductive hydrogels incorporating carbon nanoparticles: A review of synthesis, performance and applications // Particuology. 2023. V. 83. P. 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2023.06.002
4. 4. Kougkolos G., Golzio M., Laudebat L., Valdez-Nava Z., Flahaut E. Hydrogels with electrically conductive nanomaterials for biomedical applications // J. Mater. Chem. B. 2023. V. 11. ID 2036. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb02019j
5. 5. Hussain S., Maktedar S. S. Structural, functional and mechanical performance of advanced graphene-based composite hydrogels // Results in Chemistry. 2023. V. 6. ID 101029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2023.101029
6. 6. Ni F., Chen Y., Wang Z., Zhang X., Gao F., Shao Z., Wang H. Graphene derivative based hydrogels in biomedical applications // J. Tissue Eng. 2024. V. 15. P. 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314241282131
7. 7. Lalire T., Longuet C., Taguet A. Electrical properties of graphene / multiphase polymer nanocomposites: A review // Carbon. 2024. V. 225. ID 119055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2024.119055
8. 8. Saharan R., Paliwal S. K., Tiwari A., Babu M. A., Tiwari V., Singh R., Beniwal S. K., Kumar M., Sharma A., Almalki W. H., Kazmi I., Alzarea S. I., Kukreti N., Gupta G. Beyond traditional hydrogels: The emergence of graphene oxide-based hydrogels in drug delivery // J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2024. V. 94. ID 105506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105506
9. 9. Ganguly S., Das P., Maity P. P., Mondal S., Ghosh S., Dhara S., Das N. C. Green reduced graphene oxide toughened semi-IPN monolith hydrogel as dual responsive drug release system: Rheological, physicomechanical, and electrical evaluations // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2018. V. 122. N 29. P. 7201–7218. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b02919
10. 10. Ganguly S., Ray D., Das P., Maity P. P., Mondal S., Aswal V. K., Dhara S., Das N. C. Mechanically robust dual responsive water dispersible-graphene based conductive elastomeric hydrogel for tunable pulsatile drug release // Ultrasonics Sonochem. 2018. V. 42. P. 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.11.028
11. 11. Liu J., Cui L., Losic D. Graphene and graphene oxide as new nanocarriers for drug delivery applications // Acta Biomaterialia. 2013. V. 9. N 12. P. 9243–9257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.016
12. 12. Servant A., Leon V., Jasim D., Methven L., Limousin P., Fernandez-Pacheco E. V., Prato M., Kostarelos K. Graphene-based electroresponsive scaffolds as polymeric implants for on-demand drug delivery // Advanced Healthcare Mater. 2014. V. 3. N 8. P. 1334–1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201400016
13. 13. Weaver C. L., LaRosa J. M., Luo X., Cui X. T. Electrically controlled drug delivery from graphene oxide nanocomposite films // ACS Nano. 2014. V. 8. N 2. P. 1834–1843. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn406223e
14. 14. Sahoo D., Mitra T., Chakraborty K., Sarkar P. Remotely controlled electro-responsive on-demand nanotherapy based on amine-modified graphene oxide for synergistic dual drug delivery // Mater. Today Chem. 2022. V. 25. ID 100987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j,mtchem.2022.100987
15. 15. Du P., Yan J., Long S., Xiong H., Wen N., Cai S., Wang Y., Peng D., Liu Z., Liu Y. Tumor microenvironment and NIR laser dual-responsive release of berberine 9-O-pyrazole alkyl derivative loaded in graphene oxide nanosheets for chemophotothermal synergetic cancer therapy // J. Mater. Chem. B. 2020. V. 8. N 18. P. 4046–4055. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00489h
16. 16. Arnold A. M., Singh J., Sydlik S. A. The role and future of functional graphenic materials in biomedical and human health applications // Biomacromolecules. 2025. V. 26. N 4. P. 2015–2042. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.4c01431
17. 17. Lazar A.-I., Aghasoleimani K., Semertsidou A., Vyas J., Rosca A.-L., Ficai D., Ficai A. Graphenerelated nanomaterials for biomedical applications // Nanomaterials. 2023. V. 13. N 6. ID 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13061092
18. 18. Zare I., Mirshafiei M., Kheilnezhad B., Far B. F., Hassanpour M., Pishbin E., Vaghefi S. S. E., Yazdian F., Rashedi H., Hasan A., Wang X., Adeli M., Makvandi P. Hydrogel-integrated graphene superstructures for tissue engineering: From periodontal to neural regeneration // Carbon. 2024. V. 223. ID 118970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2024.118970
19. 19. Saharan R., Paliwal S. K., Tiwari A., Babu M. A., Tiwari V., Singh R., Beniwal S. K., Kumar M., Sharma A., Almalki W. H., Kazmi I., Alzarea S. I., Kukreti N., Gupta G. Beyond traditional hydrogels: The emergence of graphene oxide-based hydrogels in drug delivery // J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2024. V. 94. ID 105506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105506
20. 20. Khakpour E., Salehi S., Naghib S. M., Ghorbanzadeh S., Zhang W. Graphene-based nanomaterials for stimuli-sensitive controlled delivery of therapeutic molecules // Frontiers Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023. V. 11. ID 1129768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1129768
21. 21. Dalla Colletta A., Pelin M., Sosa S., Fusco L., Prato M., Tubaro A. Carbon-based nanomaterials and skin: An overview // Carbon. 2022. V. 196. P. 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.05.0366
22. 22. Williams A.G., Moore E., Thomas A. Graphenebased materials in dental applications: Antibacterial, biocompatible, and bone regenerative properties // Int. J. Biomater. 2023. V. 2023. ID 8803283. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8803283
23. 23. Bisht, A., Zuniga-Bustos M., Prasher G., Gautam S., Poblete H., Singh R. P. Stabilization of carbon nanotubes and graphene by Tween-80: Mechanistic insights from spectroscopic and simulation studies // Langmuir. 2022. V. 38. N 33. P. 10173–10182. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01190
24. 24. Abreu B., Montero J., Buzaglo M., Regev O., Marques E. F. Comparative trends and molecular analysis on the surfactant-assisted dispersibility of 1D and 2D carbon materials: Multiwalled nanotubes vs graphene nanoplatelets // J. Mol. Liq. 2021. V. 333. ID 116002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116002
25. 25. Задымова Н. М. Коллоидно-химические аспекты трансдермальной доставки лекарств (обзор) // Коллоид. журн. 2013. Т. 75. № 5. С. 543–556. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0023291213050194 https://www.elibrary.ru/pguymz
26. 26. Zadymova N. M. Colloidochemical aspects of transdermal drug delivery (review) // Colloid J. 2013. V. 75. N 5. P. 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061933X13050189.
27. 27. Гатауллин А. Р., Богданова С. А., Рахматуллина А. П., Галяметдинов Ю. Г. Диспергирование углеродных нанотрубок в растворах оксиэтилированных изононилфенолов // ЖПХ. 2017. Т. 90. № 11. С. 1489–1497. https://www.elibrary.ru/zwfinl
28. 28. Gataullin A. R., Bogdanova S. A., Rakhmatullina A. P., Galyametdinov Yu. G. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes in solutions of oxyethylated isononylphenols // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2017. V. 90. N 11. P. 1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427217110118.
29. 29. Гатауллин А. Р., Абрамов В. А., Богданова С. А., Сальников В. В., Зуев Ю. Ф., Галяметдинов Ю. Г. Получение дисперсий углеродных нанотрубок в растворах оксиэтилированных жирных спиртов для модифицирования гелевых систем // Коллоид. журн. 2024. Т. 86. № 4. С. 422–435. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0023291224040022 https://www.elibrary.ru/carvxu
30. 30. Gataullin A. R., Abramov V. A., Bogdanova S. A., Salnikov V. V., Zuev Yu. F., Galyametdinov Yu. G. Dispersion in solutions of ethoxylated fatty alcohols for modifying gel systems // Colloid J. 2024. V. 86. N 3. P. 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061933X24600155.
31. 31. Ramadon D., McCrudden M. T. C., Courtenay A. J., Donnelly R. F. Enhancement strategies for transdermal drug delivery systems: Current trends and applications // Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 2022. V. 12. P. 758–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-021-00909-6
32. 32. Bide Y., Fashapoyeh M.A., Shokrollahzadeh S. Structural investigation and application of Tween-80 — choline chloride self-assemblies as osmotic agent for water desalination // Sci. Rep. 2021. V. 11. ID 17068. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96199-6
33. 33. Erawati T., Isadiartuti D., Anggalih B. D. The effect of polysorbate 20 and polysorbate 80 on the solubility of quercetin // J. Public Health Afr. 2023. V. 14. N 1. ID 2503. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2023.2503
34. 34. Almeida M., Magalhaes M., Veiga F., Figueiras A. Poloxamers, poloxamines and polymeric micelles: Definition, structure and therapeutic application in cancer // J. Polym. Res. 2018. V. 25. ID 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-017-1426-x
35. 35. Himiniuc L. M., Socolov R., Nica I., Agop M., Volovat C., Ochiuz L., Vasincu D., Rotundu A. M., Rosu I. A., Ghizdovat V., Volovat S. R. Theoretical and experimental aspects of sodium diclofenac salt release from chitosan-based hydrogels and possible applications // Gels. 2023. V. 9. N 5. ID 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9050422
36. 36. Mast M.-P., Modh H., Knoll J., Fecioru E., Wacker M. G. An update to dialysis-based drug release testing — data analysis and validation using the pharma test dispersion releaser // Pharmaceutics. 2007. V. 13. N 12. ID 2007. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13122007
37. 37. Amaro-Gahete J., Benitez A., Otero R., Esquivel D., Jimenez-Sanchidrian C., Morales J., Caballero A., Romero-Salguero F. J. A comparative study of particle size distribution of graphene nanosheets synthesized by an ultrasound-assisted method // Nanomaterials. 2019. V. 9. N 2. ID 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020152
38. 38. Milanovic M., Cirin D., Krstonosic V. The interactions in ternary system made of xanthan gum, Carbopol 940 and anionic/nonionic surfactant // J. Mol. Liq. 2021. V. 344. ID 117696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117696
39. 39. Vishnyakov A., Mao R., Kam K., Potanin A., Neimark A. V. Interactions of crosslinked polyacrylic acid polyelectrolyte gels with nonionic and ionic surfactants // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2021. V. 125. N 50. P. 13817–13828. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c08638